Texas Star Amps |
|
 |  |  |  |
Texas Star CW Transmitters
CW Transmitters. CW Transmitters ...
Texas Star Amps Index
Outcom Power Amplifier. Texas Star No Longer Manufactures Amps Under This Name. OPA76 ... ( Accessories. Texas Star Amplifier Accessories (Remote and Fan Kits) ...
Texas Star CW Transmitters
Powered by the 12 volt vehicle battery or 12 volt regulated power supply, the maximum ... Amps < 6. Impedance. 50 ohms. Duty Cycle. 100% at full output. Harmonics > 30dB down ...
Texas Star Amplifiers
CB and 10 Meter Amateur Radio Sales and Service. Free Custom Tuning. . Home of the Sparktune Modulator. Give your radio that Blazing Modulation We stock Galaxy, Cobra, magnum, Connex, General,Uniden, Workman, Dosy, Hustler, Turner
Texas Star 350DX Review
This comes at a price though, the Texas Stars will also draw more amps than most other amplifiers in the same power output range. ... The Texas Star line of amps is easily identified because of their unique use of push ...
Amateur Linear Amplifiers, Inc.
interior of amps. Insides of Amplifiers. Cool Pictures of Amps. High Frequency Theory. Inside ... of Amps. Charges. Links. Home. LINEAR AMPLIFIERS. Palomar, Texas Star, Fatboy, Messenger ...
ePowerAmps.com Palomar Texas Star Cobra Galaxy Ranger Connex
Palomar Elite Linear Amplifiers, Texas Star, Cobra, Galaxy, Ranger, Connex, xForce, Dave Made, Eastcoast
threepillmobile2skew 1 554x330 png | TEXAS STAR DX 1000 w FREE SHIPPING | TEXAS STAR OFFER |
Horns have tough time seeing replay of championship
Sometimes it just comes down to the little things. When you come so very close to an epic goal, in this case a national championship, it’s hard not to look back and wonder what extra efforts could have been made to make a difference in the ultimate outcome. Herein lies the source of vengeance for the Texas volleyball team for the upcoming season, with vivid memories of a heartbreaking December ...
 |
Foursquare Surpasses 3 Million Users
FoursquareFoursquare now has more than 3 million users, if the site's public user registration numbers are correct.The 3 millionth member appears to be Brian S. from St. Louis, Missouri, who has yet to check in to any venues via the mobile-based social network.Foursquare's growth has been accelerating rapidly lately. The service hit 2.6 million users on August 2, up from 725,000 in March. The launch of Facebook Places, which many thought would bring about the startup's demise, instead resulted in the biggest day of signups ever, CEO Dennis Crowley recently revealed.Given that Foursquare appears to have a little more than 3.02 million users now, we can determine that it is growing by more than 15,500 users per day (a little less than the 18,000 per day Crowley told the LA Times last week), or nearly half a million users per month.Although already rapid, that rate may very well pick up now that Foursquare has taken over Times Square.[via TechCrunch]For more Mobile coverage:Follow Mashable Mobile on TwitterBecome a Fan on FacebookSubscribe to the Mobile channelDownload our free apps for iPhone and iPad |
|
Buzz by Leo Laporte from Buzz
Awesome Drop - this is an amazing app for easily transfering files from any computer with Internet access (and a decent browser) to your Android phone. Works amazingly well, totally recommended. |
|
Hamilton wins Belgian Grand Prix
Lewis Hamilton storms to victory in the Belgian Grand Prix after an incident-packed race at Spa-Francorchamps. |
|
Too Few Women In Tech? Stop Blaming The Men. Or At Least Stop Blaming Me.
Success in Silicon Valley, most would agree, is more merit driven than almost any other place in the world. It doesnt matter how old you are, what sex you are, what politics you support or what color you are. If you idea rocks and you can execute, you can change the world and/or get really, stinking rich. For the most part Ive sat on the sidelines over the years during the endless debates about how we need to do more to encourage more women to start companies. What I mean by sat on the sidelines is this until today I havent really said what I felt. Now Im going to. Heres why. Yet another article, this time in the Wall Street Journal, takes a shot at us and others for not doing enough to help women in tech. Says Rachel Sklar, a perennial TechCrunch critic: Part of changing the ratio is just changing awareness, so that the next time Techcrunch is planning a Techcrunch Disrupt, they wont be able to not see the overwhelming maleness of it, said Ms. Sklar, referring to the influential tech conference. Yeah ok, whatever Rachel. Every damn time we have a conference we fret over how we can find women to fill speaking slots. We ask our friends and contacts for suggestions. We beg women to come and speak. Where do we end up? With about 10% of our speakers as women. We wont put women on stage just because theyre women thats not fair to the audience whove paid thousands of dollars each to be there. But we do spend an extraordinary amount of time finding those qualified women and asking them to speak. And you know what? A lot of the time they say no. Because they are literally hounded to speak at every single tech event in the world because they are all trying so hard to find qualified women to speak at their conference. Whats The Real Problem? I could, like others (see all the links in that Fred Wilson post too), write pandering but meaningless posts agonizing over the problem and suggesting creative ways that we (men) could do more to help women. I could point out that the CEO of TechCrunch is a woman, as is two of our four senior editors (Im one of the three). And how we seek out women focused events and startups and cover them to death. But Im not going to do that. Instead Im going to tell it like it is. And what it is is this: statistically speaking women have a huge advantage as entrepreneurs, because the press is dying to write about them, and venture capitalists are dying to fund them. Just so no one will point the accusing finger of discrimination at them. That WSJ article also criticizes Y Combinator for having just 14 female founders out of their 208 startups to date. But I know that Y Combinator wants really, really wants female founders and that there just arent very many of them. I know this because Y Combinator cofounder Jessica Livingston has told me how excited they are to get applications from women, and that they want to do everything they can to get more female applicants. What they probably wont admit, but I suspect is true anyway, is that the rate of acceptance for female applicants is far higher than for male applicants. The problem isnt that Silicon Valley is keeping women down, or not doing enough to encourage female entrepreneurs. The opposite is true. No, the problem is that not enough women want to become entrepreneurs. Why? I was asked that question as part of a New York Times interview earlier this year. I dodged it completely, and referred them to Cyan Banister, the founder of Zivity, instead: Q. Do you anticipate that there will be more companies led by women at the TC50 and Disrupt this year? A. Women are really tough. I have no idea why. We invited a team founded by a woman to Disrupt. But they canceled. There just arent a lot of female tech entrepreneurs out there relative to the number of men, I think. We celebrate the ones we find whenever we find them. Theres a chance well write about what theyre doing, simply because theyre a fairly rare thing in our world. But it is really hard to find female entrepreneurs in tech, in my experience. I really think this is an industry-wide problem. Q. How do the female tech entrepreneurs and investors in your community feel about this situation? A. Theres a fascinating company, Zivity, its a venture-funded, adult photography community yes, they put up pictures of naked women online it was co-founded and is run by a woman, Cyan Banister. She wrote me in response to a post about women who are entrepreneurs, saying, basically, though these are not her exact words, women [stink] as entrepreneurs a lot of the time because they are nurturing and not risk-taking enough by nature. She also said when men roll the dice and take risks, that society doesnt punish them at all, and its in their nature to take stupid risks. I didnt respond to that. I didnt want to jump into that debate. And I guess I still dont. Is Cyan right? I dont know, Im from Mars, not Venus and I cannot speak intelligently about the nurturing and risk tolerance needs of women. But I will say this. The next time you women want to start pointing the finger at me when discussing the problem of too few women in tech, just stop. Look in the mirror. And realize this there are women who complain about how there are too few women in tech, and there are women who go out and just start companies. Lets have less of the former and more of the latter, please. And when you do start your company, well cover it. Promise. |
|
Buzz by Leo Laporte from Buzz
Live now: This Week In Tech with @KevinRose, Dwight @dsilverman Silverman, Robert @scobleizer Scole, and @AdamCurry. Watch live at http://live.twti.tv. Dscuss at http://irc.twit.tv |